Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:19:02 -0500
"Fred J. McCall" <fmccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n06cl3ti8ostg7gno7kmgbasv4lll4io0h@xxxxxxxxxx
As long as we keep Shuttle-derived vehicles we will keep the Shuttle
'standing army' and the costs will stay high.
This is the best argument against any shuttle derived launch vehicle. A
shuttle derived vehicle locks NASA into a system that has very little
potential for future cost savings.
Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Ross B Tierney
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- References:
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Ross B Tierney
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Prev by Date: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Next by Date: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Previous by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Next by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Index(es):