Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:01:09 GMT
behlingjo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 5, 2:41 pm, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
I wasn't referring to a "fueled spacecraft." We were referring to
"cargo" (e.g., logistics resupply for ISS).
I have been referring to any type of payload
Cargo is not just "logistics resupply for ISS". Cargo is everything
including fueled spacecraft.
That is why "do not mix crew and cargo" is a good rule
Conclusion fails to follow from premise.
The rule is not " don't mix crew and ISS logistics"
As "ISS logistics" are cargo - the rule "don't mix crew and ISS
logistics" derives directly from "don't mix crew and cargo".
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- References:
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Prev by Date: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Next by Date: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Previous by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Next by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|