Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>

On Dec 5, 7:17 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6 Dic, 00:03, behlin...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Dec 5, 4:25 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is where you completely wrong. The internet is not the only
place where ideas are published. Direct existed before your idea, it
was in the ESAS.

NOT TRUE AND NOT NOW
OFTEN, DOCUMENTS BORN FIRST ON PAPER, BUT, EVERYTHING PRINTED, GOES ON
THE WEB IN A MATTER OF HOURS/DAYS
SO, THE WEB COULD NOT BE THE FIRST SOURCE BUT IS ALWAYS PRETTY CLOSE
TO THE DATE THINGS ARE INVENTED/PRINTED

Boeing's refueling station existed long before you and Boeing put it on the internet.

I HAVE THE EVIDENCE THAT I WAS THE FIRST AND MY EVIDENCE HAS 100%
VALUE UNTIL OTHERS GIVE THE EVIDENCE THAT I'M WRONG ... WITHOUT ANY
EVIDENCE, MY PROPOSAL WAS/IS THE FIRST AND YOUR CLAIM ONLY A GUESS

Stumpy existed before it got on the internet

AGAIN, I'VE THE CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT I'M RIGHT AND I WAIT TO SEE
EVIDENCES, NOT GUESS, THAT I'M WRONG

Many studies never make it to the internet.

IF A STUDY IS NOT PUBLISHED ON THE WEB OR FIRST ON PAPER AND AFTER ON
THE WEB IT DON'T EXIST
IF WE APPLY YOUR PRINCIPLE, ANYONE CAN SAY TO BE THE INVENTOR OF THE
TRANSISTOR, THE PC, THE SHUTTLE, ETC.
PEOPLES THAT INVENTS IDEAS PUBLISH THEM, TALK OF THEM OR PATENT THEM
(IF PATENTABLE) NOT ONLY "THINK" THEM
AGAIN, GIVE US CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF WHAT YOU SAY

Publishing on the internet is not the same as copyrighting.

WRONG, PUBLISH ON THE WEB ACTUALLY IS COPYRIGHT OF TEXTS, IMAGES,
PROPOSALS, ETC. BUT IT'S NOT A PATENT
ALSO, IDEAS CAN'T BE PATENTED BUT THOSE WHO INVENTED FIRST THOUSANDS
THINGS ARE WELL KNOWN

Wrong on all points. Especially placing something on web is NOT a
copyright.

Not everything goes on the web. Many studies never are put on the web


Your website is only proof that you are wrong on everything. You are
a poor lost soul looking for attention that has no credible ideas
attributed to himself
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electrostatic Induction
    ... evidence that it was possible- birds. ... Science is a discipline, and as such one should carry it out ... but will not elaborate for my own reasons. ... The number of visits I have done to the patent office, ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: battle of the surfaces: someone has a patent on this!
    ... it depends on what you mean by "evidence that someone ... patent office would have knocked down her applicaton from the get-go, ... What part of "the US is a first to invent, ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Can you say Bitch?
    ... patent or patents that might be something that interests me as a boater. ... I mean, you talk a lot about inventions, and you surely have put forth a ... Do you have any evidence of attending Yale? ... Where would someone find out about his hand built boats? ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: battle of the surfaces: someone has a patent on this!
    ... Robin wrote: ... I don't think that you should be able to patent obvious ideas." ... by statute and caselaw definition you can't patent obvious ideas. ... unless you have evidence - EVIDENCE - to the contrary. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry
    ... :> The credible evidence states that Oswald didn't fire a shot. ... :> No one did ANYTHING immediately other than the shooters. ...
    (sci.space.policy)