Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:10:47 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 5, 6:34 pm, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:16:36 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
behlin...@xxxxxxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:
On Dec 5, 2:41 pm, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
I'm quite familiar with that. I used to work closely with the payload
integration folks in Downey. That was to protect the Orbiter itself,
and had nothing to do with actual man rating, regardless of whether or
not NASA chose to call it that (perhaps you don't understand what "man
rating" actually is?). Even without crew, you'd have done the same
thing on any reusable vehicle, because the vehicle is such a costly
asset.
Horse hockey. It was crew driven by the safety panel. Downey had
nothing to do with it.
This is a complete non sequitur.
I know what manrating is. I worked on the LV side for OSP.
That means nothing in terms of knowing what man rating is.
And what have you done to make you an expert?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- References:
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Prev by Date: Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- Next by Date: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Previous by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Next by thread: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|