>>> again... I was RIGHT about the (bad) ESAS architecture 21 months ago >>>
- From: gaetanomarano <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:05:00 -0800 (PST)
..
21 MONTHS ago I've published the article "Great part of the VSE moon
missions may fail":
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/004.html
where I've explained WHY the moon missions may fail with the 1.5
launch architecture
then, I've started some discussions about this problem, like this on
the BAUT forum:
http://www.bautforum.com/space-exploration/40501-great-part-vse-moon-missions-may-fail.html
and now (21 months after my article) NASA admits (but not acknowledge)
that a problem exists
that's why they have changed the moon missions' architecture to launch
the Ares-1 before the Ares-5:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/12/21/220464/nasas-moon-mission-could-see-major-change-in-concept-of.html
but they have lost 21 months to do that
so, why they don't (simply) adopt my suggestions (since they READ my
website) saving time and money? :) :) :)
..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: >>> again...gaetanomarano is telling lies
- From: behlingjo
- Re: >>> again...gaetanomarano is telling lies
- Prev by Date: Re: >>> BreakingNews: Space.com and uplink.space.com HACKED >>>
- Next by Date: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Previous by thread: >>> BreakingNews: Space.com and uplink.space.com HACKED >>>
- Next by thread: Re: >>> again...gaetanomarano is telling lies
- Index(es):