Re: space travel can change the world

On Jan 2, 3:31 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 2, 9:36 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 2, 2:33 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Perhaps you are the MI5 freak that's robo-posting. Can you prove
otherwise?

Sure. By their results you will know them. I have consistently and
persistently sought to engage in exciting compelling and relevant
conversations on these topics providing a high degree of analysis and
deep bibliographic references. Your postings, and the postings of the
Mi5 nutjob don't do any of that, and in fact degrade the effectiveness
of my messages. Obviously, I would not post something and then post
something that harmed what I posted later. Clearly, it is another
party.

BTW, if Usenet didn't already exist

But it does exist Brad.

but I was that guy put in charge
of MI5/CIA/NSA,

But such an agency doesn't exist, and if it did, you would NOT be put
in charge.

I'd create

How? Creating something requires more than just raising your hand
and saying 'engage' or some such thing.

not only this Usenet

There are others?

but all of those brown-
nosed clowns

That image of armies of people with your *** on their nose gets you
hard doesn't it Brad? Doesn't that ever worry you, you know, make
you think there's something not quite right in YOUR head? Oh, I see,
OF COURSE NOT!

lol. Freak!

as my minions

Yes. They gotta pretend to like your stink. I get the picture. You
Freak!

to boot, and
I'd most certainly create

How would you create this again friend? Oh, I see, YOU HAVE NO IDEA -
you just have to take another ***, and you just THINK you'd like to
create something if you could but you can't so you waste my time with
it. sheez.

the
continually informative but otherwise do-nothing likes of yourself.

hmm.. are you saying I'm a do nothing Brad? Well, I can see how
writing something in a venue that YOU read, might very well be seen by
you, as do nothiing, because depsite all your posturing, YOU know what
an ineffective blow hard you are.

But this is just another presumption based on the fact that I trouble
to post on usenet anything.. and I've already said, it doesn't cost
me much, and I have my reasons! lol.

BTW No.2,

Oh no there's more! Please Brad, DON'T - and say that you did.
That'd save us both time.

h2o2 isn't the all-bad

as what a hair bleach? On that I would agree. H2O2 isn't all that
bad as a bleach. As a potential secondary power source? Maybe if you
get the details right. I went into gory detail about that for you
Brad.

As a primary source of energy for humanity? hahaha.. gotta laugh at
that one. I've spent minutes and minutes researching that one for
you. You keep ignoring reality.

Well what are you gonna do? You are obviously posting this for a
reason having nothing at all to do with what you purportedly are
writing about.

You are likely posting your *** for the same reason Lancaster and
others are saying di-hydrogen oxide is a dangerous chemical because
hundreds of people get asphyxiated each year by it. You figure in
your black propaganda that you can confuse people by talking about
hydrogen-peroxide whenever I talk about hydrogen. Cute Brad. It just
goes to show, that you are not very honest in your behavior. You KNOW
the facts about hydrogen peroxide - because I told you THREE TIMES -
and you persist in repeating your damnable lies - without usefully
addressing a single point I made.

and otherwise useless product of
energy storage that you keep touting.

See? Confusing hydrogen peroxide - which is an explosive and contains
only 2.7 MJ per kg and costs about 5x as much as gasoline per MJ - and
hydrogen gas - which is a fuel, not an explosive, and contains 143 MJ
pe rkg - and costs about 1/5th as much as gasoline per MJ - when I
make it with my solar panels.

Too bad we still don't have
those Mook PV farms for making all of that cheap LH2

Gaseous hydrogen friend. Dude, I'm working on it.

or whatever
volumes of h2o2,

Hydrogen peroxide is useless except for specialty applications and
doesn't require solar panels to be made cost effectively for that.

and so what's the difference?

Between what and what? You're not making much sense Brad.

Apparently you're not even a tenth as smart as Warren Buffett,

I'm not a tenth his age. So, that's okay.

and to
think Buffett is not actually all that physics nor science smart to
start with.

Is that a requirement for making money?

BTW No.3, because I've promoted the composite skin or entire
structural airframe as being composite tough and insulative, as such
you can't ever use that method of achieving good volumetric fuel
storage, mostly because it wasn't of your idea to start with. (sorry
about that)

Does this sentence even make sense? lol.

- Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

Brad - save yourself some embarassment - QUIT POSTING

lol.

- Show quoted text -

Your MI5 mindset of such a Semitic form of naysayism is showing
itself, and it's not a pretty picture.

- Brad Guth
.

Loading