Re: Incorrect and clueless again.
- From: Willie.Mookie@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:20:33 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 4, 11:36 am, behlin...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 3, 2:36 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> .
WHY spend million$$$ to build "spaceports" ???
when suborbital planes with jets (like the EADS Astrium design) will
be available, every small jet-executives' airport around the world
will be sufficient for takeoff and landing
http://space.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn12059/dn12059-1_60...
.
Incorrect and clueless again.
suborbital planes use propellants which small jet-executives airports
are not sited for, hence the need for spaceports
Suborbital is not orbital or trans lunar or trans planetary...
Although, a ship capable of 1/3 gee could take off with wings on Earth
and land vertically on the moon under rocket power - and take off - in
1/6th gravity - if it had the specific impulse to do all that in one
stage AND carry the wings along.. hmm...
.
- References:
- >>> WHY spend MILLION$$$ to build "SPACEPORTS" ??? >>>
- From: gaetanomarano
- Incorrect and clueless again.
- From: behlingjo
- >>> WHY spend MILLION$$$ to build "SPACEPORTS" ??? >>>
- Prev by Date: Re: antimatter rockets
- Next by Date: Re: The Altair has Landed
- Previous by thread: Incorrect and clueless again.
- Next by thread: Re: Incorrect and clueless again.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|