>>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- From: gaetanomarano <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:50:27 -0800 (PST)
..
COTS actually IS a good idea and a revolution of past NASA policy
about space hardware contractors, but the practical application of
COTS is VERY BAD and FLAWED in several points
that since to-day's COTS is just a DUPLICATION (of research, efforts
and vehicles) with ready (or soon) available (or old) things rather
than the development of NEW things
my opinion about "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) is
explained in this new ghostNASA article:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/020wrongcots.html
..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: >>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- From: BradGuth
- Re: >>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- From: BradGuth
- Re: >>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: >>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheap Access to Space
- Next by Date: Re: space travel can change the world
- Previous by thread: Optics Advances to Eclipse Hubble
- Next by thread: Re: >>> "What's wrong in COTS" (and HOW to do it BETTER) >>>
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading