Re: Clueless in Italy part III
- From: behlingjo@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:12:18 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 29, 2:46 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rather than one of the Direct-
propaganda crew that runs all Space forums and blogs to post critics
and insults (at every hour of the day and the night) against all
peoples who don't support Direct or (worse) say it is a "FAST-SLV-like
but FOUR months LATER" concept... :) :) :)
It doesn't matter IF (not saying it did) Direct came out 4 months
later. They are both copies of early NASA designs. The difference
is Direct is a refined proposal with analysis done by many experts.
Cost data was developed and ground system impacts documented. Yours
is a bad photoshop pic with non viable trusses.
.
- References:
- >>> The [possible] solution for Ares-1 "vibrations" >>>
- From: gaetanomarano
- Clueless in Italy part III
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Clueless in Italy part III
- From: gaetanomarano
- Re: Clueless in Italy part III
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Clueless in Italy part III
- From: gaetanomarano
- >>> The [possible] solution for Ares-1 "vibrations" >>>
- Prev by Date: Re: We can meet all our needs through space development
- Next by Date: Re: We can meet all our needs through space development
- Previous by thread: Re: Clueless in Italy part III
- Next by thread: Thrust Oscillation Issue Threatens Ares I Design, Aviation Week
- Index(es):