Re: forests on orbit
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:30:50 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 12:59 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 31, 2:10 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2:33 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it would be far better to grow a forest in the Sahara. Energy
for the desalination of sea water to be provoded by solar power,
possibly SSP. If we assume SSP (terresrial SP merely adds to the force
of the argument) we need far less material in space doing it this way.
- Ian Parker
It's not lord Mook's idea, so without a speck of remorse it simply
can't be done, no matters what.
- Brad Guth
Reality doesn't need my defense. I am telling you why I favor
asteroid development over stripping and modifying the natural systems
of Earth with industrial disease. If you have a better idea and I'm
wrong - go out and do it. No one's stopping you.
Your idea isn't just wrong, it represents a net loss of energy and
viable resources, not to mention further pollution and spendy decades
of which we do not have such spare loot or time to work with,
especially if we keep pissing off those mostly nice Muslims or of
whatever's represented by China.
- Brad Guth
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: forests on orbit
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: forests on orbit
- Prev by Date: Re: We can meet all our needs through space development
- Next by Date: Re: Global wireless hotspot
- Previous by thread: Re: We can meet all our needs through space development
- Next by thread: Re: forests on orbit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
