Re: Global wireless hotspot

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:46:24 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away, Ian
Parker <ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

On 6 Feb, 15:07, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:25:52 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away, Ian
Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:





On 6 Feb, 13:03, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:55:54 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away, Ian
Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

We need to know, or course, the trajectory. Low powered lasers would
lelp us to do that, although when I suggested it, Rand Simberg was
much more interested in my views of anthropogenic risk.

I have no interest in your lunatic and delusionary views on anything
whatsoever.

Why do you persist in telling lies about me, and fantasizing that you
can read my mind?

What was written down and what you wrotye is in back and white you
fool. There are the "delusions in black and white"

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/4...

If I recall I was the second posting and you were the third.

What do you mean, "if you recall"?  

*Provide the quote* that substantiates your fantasy that I am
"interested in your views of anthropogenic risk," or stand branded a
lying idiot once again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You just live in a state of denial. It is no 2 and no 3 of the
indicated thread. As I said I think that precision in measurement of
asteroids is important. You do not seem to think so.

*Provide the quote*, or stand branded as a lying idiot once again. Or
at least explain why, in your apparent dementia, you don't think it
necessary to actually substantiate your lies.
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast