Re: forests on orbit

On Feb 20, 9:20 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 20, 5:26 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Feb 20, 1:07 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 19, 8:00 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Feb 18, 11:00 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 18, 6:16 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Feb 18, 3:16 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Gee whiz Willie.Moo, why not a Mook forest upon or at least within our
moon that your NASA/Apollo wizards say is so gosh darn passive, hardly
the least bit dusty, not at all electrostatic or solar wind charged or
much less reactive/anticathode worthy, and only very slightly in
places more locally radioactive than Earth.  It also looks as though
your NASA/Apollo recorded surface is capable of offering exactly the
sort of 0.75 albedo of a certain terrestrial guano island, that's
merely xenon lamp spectrum illuminated in such a selective way that
even the vibrant and often nearby planet of Venus is made invisible to
the naked/unfiltered Kodak eye.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optic...

Please read the previous two references to explain those things that
obviously confuse you.

Who needs an atmosphere or magnetosphere as shield against our passive
sun and of the wussy cosmic influx, especially when our lord
Willie.Moo and his rad-hard DNA has it all figured out, and then
some?
. - Brad Guth

I would be more than happy to arrange a space station grounded on the
moon for you Brad.  If you doubt your ability to survive, I would also
be more than happy to arrange removal of your brain, eyes, and spinal
column from your body and attempt to place it in a rad-hard robotic
body.  Um, we might want to video the procedure and sell it online to
defray medical costs.

So, all the sudden you can't actually do our moon without blowing the
entire NASA/Apollo ruse of the century.

BTW, I don't doubt my ability to survive, as long as I'm not situated
on our physically dark and nasty moon.  Within that moon is another
matter, that's most likely survivable.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Brad,

We went to the moon.  Why do you think the Russians did a sample
return from the moon with their Lunikod?  To verify the Apollo
achievement. Why do you think they never flew one to any of the Apollo
landing sites?  No point.  If the USA hadn't landed on the moon, the
Russians would have been the first to call the US on it.  A greater
geopolitical 'win' does not exist!  If there were any indication at
all that America didn't do ALL they said on the moon, the Russians
would have sent a Lunikod to the moon to bust us.

hm..  this would be a an episode of mythbusters ... doncha think?

It takes two to tango.  Get it Willie.Moo? (why of course not)

War is always chuck full of grand profits for the already rich and
powerful, especially on both sides of a fully Semitic perpetrated cold-
war.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, all the 200,000 people who worked on Apollo from 1960 through 1969
and all the Russians in the Russian space agency are all lying -
without fail- about the US going to the moon.

Why would the Russians go along with this plan?

Why couldn't Richard Nixon keep Watergate a secret?

There you go again.  You just can't keep from taking everything out of
context and of excluding whatever evidence rocks your boat, just so
the one and only Willie.Moo interpretation sticks.

I've already told others as well as yourself, multiple times in fact,
as to the how and why of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, of which
included that spendy moon race, and of most everything before and ever
since.

If you weren't such a certified born-again bigot in perpetual denial,
I'd explain it once again.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Context? You're the one stomping around a thread about forests on
orbit crapping all over it with your crazy conspieracy theories and
when you can't answer a simple question that demonstrates your
conspiracy theory is nuts, you're the one who becomes bad-tempered.

I've asked you before, and I askyou again. Please ignore my posts in
the future. Please do not post to any thread I start? I mean you can
start any sort of discussion you want. you can create a moon landing
conspiracy discussion any time - without shitting on what I have to
say? Why the hell post here on my ***? I'm relating to folks some
of the results of my work on space forestry plantations. What the
hell does that have to do with moon landing conspiracies? NOTHING!
So, why post it here? Why *** on this thread like you *** on every
other thread with your bull***? Go start your own thread and leave
me the f**k alone on that ***! lol.

That's the context you don't get.

I don't care what you have to say on this subject, I've heard it all
before and don't want to hear it again - especially in the context of
my thread on forests in space..

.

Quantcast