Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:43:57 +1100
Fred J. McCall wrote:
Sylvia Else <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
:So I'll accept that most of the material won't become a long term :threat, but some of it can.
:
Yes, and when you let go of a pencil all the molecules in it might
coincidentally be moving in the same direction and it might fall up.
I don't think that's possible unless you're thinking in terms of the QM uncertainty in a pencil's momentum attribute.
Pretty unlikely, though...
The probability levels are, to use an Irishism, incomparably different.
Sylvia.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- References:
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: John Park
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Prev by Date: Re: Retooling the Vision for Space Exploration
- Next by Date: Re: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Discuss Space Policy
- Previous by thread: Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Next by thread: Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|