Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Fred J. McCall <fmccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:33:30 -0700
Sylvia Else <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> Sylvia Else <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> :
:> :So I'll accept that most of the material won't become a long term
:> :threat, but some of it can.
:> :
:>
:> Yes, and when you let go of a pencil all the molecules in it might
:> coincidentally be moving in the same direction and it might fall up.
:>
:
:I don't think that's possible unless you're thinking in terms of the QM
:uncertainty in a pencil's momentum attribute.
:
If they're all heading in random directions, there is some small but
finite possibility that they could all head in the same direction.
:> Pretty unlikely, though...
:
:The probability levels are, to use an Irishism, incomparably different.
:
Not so much, no.
That's sort of the point...
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- References:
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: John Park
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Prev by Date: Re: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Discuss Space Policy
- Next by Date: Re: But not to worry
- Previous by thread: Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Next by thread: Re: Pentagon to Shoot down Spy Sat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|