Re: Space Travel
- From: "D. Orbitt" <msu1049321@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:45:17 -0800 (PST)
E=MC squared makes it unlikely a reaction-powered craft could
accellerate beyond "C" because the closer it approaches that speed,
the more mass it takes on, requiring more energy to accellerate it,
more fuel, and so on, in a loop, so you could (eventually) get
incredibly close to C with a reaction motor, assuming you had nearly
infinite power and reacton mass to run your motor, but like zeno's
paradox in philosophy, you can never quite get there, just slice up
smaller and smaller segments of "nearly there".
FTL would require some kind of mathematics and physics where you could
"throw away" the increasing mass somehow. Perhaps when we truly
understand gravity, a way may be found, but I'm not optimistic about
that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space Travel
- From: "Blattus Slafaly £ ¥ 0/00 :)"
- Re: Space Travel
- References:
- Space Travel
- From: James Colvier
- Re: Space Travel
- From: Ian Parker
- Space Travel
- Prev by Date: Re: Retooling the Vision for Space Exploration
- Next by Date: Re: Space Travel
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Travel
- Next by thread: Re: Space Travel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|