Re: forests on orbit

On Feb 26, 4:19 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:04 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Feb 26, 10:41 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I am sponsoring 8 energy projects overseas, and 1 energy project in
Ohio.

Due to recent legislation in Ohio I am currently offering the
following to anyone with more than 20,000 sf of roof top space;

I will pay the going rate per kilowatt-hour per month per square foot
of solar panels I put on your roof - in Ohio - based on DOE cost
figures. In Ohio this is 7.71 cents. So, I offer 7.71 cents per
square foot per month on a 30 year lease - to use your rooftop for
solar collector site. This money is paid out of the revenue earned
from the equipment I build own and operate on the rooftop.

I am currently offering the following to anyone with more than 100
acres of un-reclaimed land in Ohio. I will pay 1/4 the going rate per
kilowatt hour per month per square foot of solar panels I put on your
un-reclaimed brownfield site - in Ohio. this is 1.92 cents per square
foot per month on a 30 year lease. - to use your brownfield site. The
money is paid out of the revenue earned from the equipment I build own
and operate on the site. This meets the requirement of productive use
according to the 1976 surface reclamation act.

There are non-recurring engineering charges paid by the property
owner. $2 per square foot of rooftop per building - with a 20,000 sf
minimum - and $21,780 per acre for a mine site - 100 acre minimum.

Once the acrhitectural and engineering work is completed for each
site, a contract with a buyer for energy is entered into. The
contracts are bankable - and the projected revenue streams are
monetized well before construction is even started - this adds $12 per
square foot to the value of buildings - based on roof area - and .
$130,680 per acre to the value of strip mines, plus eliminating
reclamation costs.

Now your are talking the sort of common sense that the rest of us
terrestrial limited village idiots can visualize as well as learn to
appreciate.

A viable plan of investment payback (though long-term) that'll
directly improve upon the quality and affordable way of life for the
greater good of humanity, and of indirectly improving upon our badly
failing environment without increasing our CO2/NOx footprint. On this
you should get a fair number of takers.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep, especially since the contracts can be monetized today to realize
value today for those signing up. This wasn't possible last week,
because the legislation wasn't signed into law until this week in the
State of Ohio.

In that case, there's hope even if it's too little too late.
California has had a pro green energy thing for several years, with
absolutely zero negative impact, meaning that thus far it has been a
win-win for everyone except those Exxon/ENRON types that would just as
soon screw their own mothers as well as continually pollute and global
warm our environment for an extra buck, even if it's a bloody Muslim
buck doesn't matter.
.. - Brad Guth
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: forests on orbit
    ... of solar panels I put on your roof - in Ohio - based on DOE cost ... acres of un-reclaimed land in Ohio. ... kilowatt hour per month per square foot of solar panels I put on your ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: forests on orbit
    ... of solar panels I put on your roof - in Ohio - based on DOE cost ... kilowatt hour per month per square foot of solar panels I put on your ... When the US enters into a system of carbon ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Solar Power in London
    ... central london. ... I'd have to put them on the flat piece of the roof on ... at best you will be able to power a few isolated devices and most of the time they will not be producing the solar panels will sit idle not being allowed to input into the grid which further reduces their cost effectiveness. ...
    (uk.environment)
  • Re: Solar Power in London
    ... central london. ... I'd have to put them on the flat piece of the roof on ... at best you will be able to power a few isolated devices and most of the time they will not be producing the solar panels will sit idle not being allowed to input into the grid which further reduces their cost effectiveness. ...
    (uk.environment)
  • Re: News from Oz
    ... >>> There was some interesting ideas, they had a roof done with solar panels ... > of room to set them up and they wouldn't need to adversely effect a roof. ... where the batteries last years longer if they're kept topped up - the duty ... to maintain power to remote electric fencing. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)