Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:40:03 GMT
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:37:47 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Alan
Erskine" <alan.erskine@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47e9745f.893189688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:24:59 GMT, in a place far, far away, Brian
Thorn <bthorn64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
Maybe go back to the higher Isp SSME instead of RS-68?
That would really up the per-flight cost.
You mean higher than it will be with the current configuration? :-/
Yes, that's that's what those words generally mean. I wasn't implying
that the current planned cost will be low.
.
- References:
- NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: dumpster4
- Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- From: Alan Erskine
- NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- Prev by Date: Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- Next by Date: Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- Next by thread: Re: NASA Needs A Bigger Ares V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
