Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- From: behlingjo@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:05:19 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 1, 3:10 am, William Elliot <ma...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No discussion was had about reduction of O_3 to O_2.
Because it is minor compared to other events. It wasn't worth
mentioning. The launch that put the spacecraft into orbit did more
damage.
No discussion was
had about the importance of destroying the satillete to vaporize in space
to assure no chunks of top secrete spy equipment would be delivered to
unauthorized countries.
This was discussed
No discussion was made about how easily three
ordinary missiles were converted to space warfare.
Incorrect. This was an existing capability. The missiles were
already modified for missile defense. No real changes were made other
than software
Just some, oh my gosh,
US, who won't sign no space war treaties, weren't doing that.
Typical uninformed post. Those treaties would not affect this "test"
This was a ground launched system which is not covered by those
treaties
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- References:
- Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- Prev by Date: Re: Retooling the Vision for Space Exploration
- Next by Date: Re: Retooling the Vision for Space Exploration
- Previous by thread: Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- Next by thread: Re: Hydrazine and the Upper Atmoshpere
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
