Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:33:09 GMT
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:46:11 +0100 (CET), in a place far, far away,
Wallace Wright <wwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:22:23AM +0000, Rand Simberg wrote:
If you think that Guth's posts have more signal than noise, you either
haven't read many of them, or...well, I won't say what the "or" is.
I wouldn't say there is more signal than noise, just that there is signal
buried among the noise -- disconnected from any immediate context, but you
can see he is trying to put content in his messages.
None that I've ever noticed, but he's been in my killfile for years.
Pretty much, if you've read one of Brad's posts, you've read them all.
Ian Parker is actually a little more interesting, but still not worth
reading.
At least Mr. Parker is capable of stringing two sentences together without
violating accepted rules of grammar.
Occasionally, but not always. Even if true, it doesn't render him
worth reading.
.
- References:
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: OM
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Alan Erskine
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Wallace Wright
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- From: Wallace Wright
- Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- Prev by Date: Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- Next by Date: Re: We can meet all our needs through space development
- Previous by thread: Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- Next by thread: Re: Henry Spencer - Any Word?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|