Re: SpaceX vs. Japan
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:53:27 GMT
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
Alex Terrell <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
On 19 Mar, 16:29, spacecr...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Rather than contracting SpaceX to develop Falcon9/Dragon for mannedActually Dragon is more a Plan B to Orion. When President Obama
access to the ISS, NASA should consider having the State Department
urge Japan to develop a manned capsule for the H-2 rocket. There are
two reasons for this:
1) In a tight funding environment, Falcon9/Dragon is a direct
competitor for Project Constellation. If the U.S. is to keep the eye
on the prize of manned Lunar/Planetary exploration, it will need
Project Constellation. The alternative is to remain stuck in LEO for
a few more decades.
cancels Ares and Orion, Dragon will be needed to access ISS.
There's not going to be a President Obama.
.
- References:
- SpaceX vs. Japan
- From: spacecrate
- Re: SpaceX vs. Japan
- From: Alex Terrell
- SpaceX vs. Japan
- Prev by Date: Re: SpaceX vs. Japan
- Next by Date: Re: space travel or war
- Previous by thread: Re: SpaceX vs. Japan
- Next by thread: Re: SpaceX vs. Japan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|