Re: sci space policy targeted by disinformation experts?

On Mar 24, 1:20 pm, Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24 Mar, 18:44, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


You are in fact one of the "disinformation experts", are you not?

I am not. You know my strictures on the Iraq war etc. I am NOT an
apologist for the military. This is what William Mook seemed to imply
if I read him correctly.

It's hard to nearly impossible to read William Mook correctly, whereas
even fully agreeing with his often twisted mindset isn't good enough,
because it usually has to be 100% Mook, or nothing.


You are also technically blind as a bat, as well as a mainstream bigot
of profound nayism, working on behalf of stalking and bashing upon all
such off-world things that can be observed or otherwise detected as ET
worthy.

I think people who criticise "mainsteam" positions ought to be aware
of the scientific basis of these positions. It should not be done
lightly. For example Relativity is one of the best attested of all
scientific theories with an abundance of evidence. A mainsteam
scientist looks at evidence.

They just never look at pictures of any kind, that is unless it's
pictures of whatever they wish to impose or force upon others, as
their one and only interpretation being the one and only truth.


This does not apply to politics. Indeed one of my main criticisms is
that there is no mainsteam posion. To take a simple example. If
someone comes to me and talks about (say) relativity, I want to know
whether he understands tensor calculus. If someone comes up to me with
a position of Iraq, I would similarly want to know his credentials.
There was no Arabic speaker uin the decision making team, that is to
say Relativity is to be decided by those people who do not know about
tensors!

If you are working for Google Translate, ideally you need to know
about statistics and Arabic. In fact they understand statistics very
but do not seem to know Arabic, and do not seem to understand about
case.

Huius civitatis - Rand will know what I mean. There are BTW advantages
in knowing Latin.

æÇáËÇäí¡ ÇáÓÏ ÇáÚÇáí¡ ÑãÒ áØÇÞÉ åÐå ÇáÃãÉ. Second, the High Dam, a
symbol of the energy this nation. I am not an arabist but I put
"this"
into GT and got åÐ Now åÐå is a genitive and means "of this" [nation].
(Huius civitatis)

This my friend is mainstream. We learn what is relevant.

Apparently of what's perfectly intelligent and otherwise rational
looking about a certain complex location on Venus, according to your
closed mainstream mindset, is not the least bit relevant to anything.

Seems allowing the mainstream status quo to continually get away with
premeditated murder in the first degree, as such isn't the least bit
relevant either.

At what point of collateral damage and carnage of the innocent (not to
mention global inflation as well as our global polluting and warming)
do you draw the line?

At what point of allowing the ongoing ruse/sting of our mutually
perpetrated cold-war(s) and of our NASA/Apollo century for profit to
take us ever deeper into their infowar cesspool of disinformation, is
past the point of no return?

Your expertise in cesspool diving depth (much the same as William
Mook's) seems almost without limits, or much less of any speck of
remorse. Don't you think it's past due that we few good-guys kick
***?
. - Brad Guth
.

Quantcast