Re: sci space policy targeted by disinformation experts?

On Mar 27, 1:55 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 26, 7:59 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





This is the opening scene - then something really interesting happens.

lol.

I just don't know what, which is why i'm not in hollywood!  lol.

Actually, I thought of another line.  Bond - through is doppleganger
asks Q about the weapons potential of this technology.  Q replies -
some things Mr. Bond even you cannot know.  very cryptic.  Would be an
instant classic.

To Q atom bombs are about as interesting as yesterday's trash. SDI
fits in his universe about the way the dirigible fits into the history
of air travel - oh we achieved all our technical goals, and it serves
its purpose keeping the world safe - but, of course it was quickly
surpassed  and- uh, shame on you James you got me talking about things
I shouldn't.

To Bond of course its so easy defeating the bad guys there's no more
challenge.

That would set the stage

The technology itself becomes a problem..

hmm...

And all of this could-have-been/should-have-been story line has what
to do with "sci space policy targeted by disinformation experts?"  Are
you playing one of the good-guys or bad-guys? (why of course, as long
as lord Mook get his way it really doesn't matter, does it)
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm following the conversation started by Ian Parker. You know,
responding to what people are actually writing in a creative way
rather than repeating the same old words over and over again. You
ought to try it sometime. lol.
.

Relevant Pages