Re: sci space policy targeted by disinformation experts?



On Mar 28, 5:21 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 28, 12:22 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 27, 6:14 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Mar 26, 5:31 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 25, 2:06�am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:41 pm, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:38:52 GMT, in a place far, far away,
jsav...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Savard) made the phosphor on
my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:17:25 -0700 (PDT), Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote,
in part:

I mention this in response to the highly offensive advertisements and
postings this news group has been subject to recently - along with
pointing out that these poses have not been removed despite their
abusive nature.

This is an unmoderated USENET group, which is why the offensive
advertising appearing here, and in many other newsgroups, has not been
removed. It has nothing to do with a government conspiracy.

Mook seems to be going further and further over the edge as time goes
by.

Mook lives on a flat Earth where only his approved religions and
government never tells a lie or excludes evidence, so that edge is
quite real and scary.
. - Brad Guth - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

This from a man who posts a doctored speech from JFK and says its the
actual speech even though it presents things diametrically opposed to
the original recording.

lol

That is not a justifiable lie sir. That is a pernicious lie and marks
you as untrustworthy - particularlly since I called you on it four
years ago - the exact same speech. sheez.

Once again, coming from such a certified LLPOF bigot as yourself,
we'll just have to take your renewable, unlimited and otherwise dirt
cheap PV obtained energy and green hydrogen producing words for it
all.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wait a minute, are you saying the JFK Press Conference speech that was
butchured in the You Tube video YOU posted was accurate? AND you are
calling ME a liar for posting the accurate text of the speech, along
with the speech audio itself from the JFK Presidential Library?

haha.. is that what you're saying you ***?

? accurate text of the speech ? (says who?)

Since when does "accurate text" get officially recorded and forever
kept as unchanged?

All sorts of public records are either edited and/or entirely excluded
before going into the archives accessible to the public eye. Remember
those 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo records that vanished as though
worth less than used toilet paper?

Clearly you still think your faith-based government tells no lies and
does no harm that couldn't have just as easily been avoided. Way to
go, Mook.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're avoiding the question and continuing the lies by changing the
subject.

Answer the question and prove you are not a liar in this instance..

What evidence do you have that THAT speech as recorded by the
Presidential Library is inaccurate in any way? What evidence?

What evidence do you have that the speech you posted WASN'T
butchured?

I said both times I corrected you that if you carefully listen to both
recordings side by side, you can HEAR the edits in YOUR version, you
can HEAR the wierd inflections of voice and tone as the digitally
copied words are played in the version you posted.

You think you can protect yourself by telling more lies on top of the
lies you've already told. Can't you see you are part of the
problem?
.

The matter of fact truth does seem to upset you, in that faith-based
groups and certain other insider power groups are in fact the puppet-
masters in charge of those you and others of your silly kind
continually brown-nose.

For someone w/o remorse, you are acting very MI5/CIA strange about all
of this.
. - Brad Guth

.


Quantcast