Re: LA-4541-MS

On Mar 30, 1:13 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:05 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Mar 29, 11:02 pm, OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:57:33 +0100, Herhor <herhor_ANTYSP...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

Is this guy a troll?

...Yes, he is. Just killfile him and put him out of our misery.

                                OM
--
   ]=====================================[
   ]   OMBlog -http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld[
   ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
   ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
   ]=====================================[

I kill filed OM long ago.  So, yes, to those my ideas do not resonate,
please pleae kill file me!   Are you listening Brad?  lol.

OOPS! it seems they were talking about yourself being a troll.  For
God's sake, don't give them guys any further ideas of killing off lord
Willie.Moo, because you might just end up on a stick like they did to
Jesus Christ.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Brad,

Why are you wasting your time with me? Don't you have more important
things to do? I mean, if I were you and I truly believed there were
aliens on Venus, I'd be building a radio telescope to communicate with
them. I don't think you realize just how easy it is to communicate
with a simple ground station with Venus at closest approach. A radio
telescope, some good signal processing software and a good laptop -
you'd be in business. That's what I'd do Brad if I truly believed
there were really people on Venus. I cannot imagine a lower cost,
easier to achieve way to become world famous and prove everyone wrong.

So why aren't you doing that? It should have been done already - go
do it.

Or maybe they are partial to laser systems? Well, there are some
friends of mine in optical SETI that have shown you can communicate
interstellar distances with quite modest telescopes and the right
laser setup. Get one of those too. Costs less than a new SUV. You
can put it on your charge cards - so why don't you do that? A small
ground station adapted for interplanetary radio communication. A fast-
fourier transform analyzer lets you listen to all frequencies at one -
signal processing software allows you to adjust to any modulation
scheme.

A small optical telescope adapted with laser setup to communicate
achieves the same thing - and can use the same signal processing
software to dedoce any sort of scheme.

So, why aren't you doing that? More importantly, why haven't you
done it already?

The same energy you put into dogging me, would have gotten you world
fame by now - so, go do it.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: LA-4541-MS
    ... Are you listening Brad? ... I don't think you realize just how easy it is to communicate ... telescope, some good signal processing software and a good laptop - ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: LA-4541-MS
    ... � Are you listening Brad? ... I don't think you realize just how easy it is to communicate ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: LA-4541-MS
    ... � Are you listening Brad? ... I don't think you realize just how easy it is to communicate ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: LA-4541-MS
    ... � Are you listening Brad? ... I don't think you realize just how easy it is to communicate ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Laser optics communications
    ... A laser shot through a telescope to another telescope some distance ... away to be picked up by a detector is certainly a way to communicate ... Well one way to get high speeds is to have a TV picture transmitted to ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)