Re: LA-4541-MS

On Apr 5, 3:35 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:56 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Apr 4, 1:53 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Apr 4, 4:15 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 4, 8:48 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Two of these propulsion units operating at low thrust, designed to
extract 40% of the unit's energy as free-electron laser energy by
using the magnetic field and plasma to achieve that end, would provide
the same sort of primary power as provided by solar pumpled free-
electron lasers. Three satellites placed in GEO beaming energy
throughout the world, supplied by lithium-6 deuteride - using hydrogen
flouride laser initiators - so, we need a constant supply of hydrogen,
deuterium, and lithium-6. The thrust from each of of the rotary
engines is directed opposite each other. Or directed through a fabrey-
perot cell with appropriate wigglers to create powerful laser beams in
the plasma. A three satellite network spaced 120 degrees apart
provides global coverage and more than enough energy for the planet.
A similar satellite at the lagrange points above the moon - both front
and back - provide power beams there as well. A three satellite
system around Mars provides similar coverage there. These quadrillion
watt fusion powered lasers using conjugate optics to direct power
beams to wherever they're needed would provide the basis for wide
scale industrial development of Earth, moon and Mars - while reducing
the impact of technology on the biosphere's on each. A satellite near
Ceres, Vesta, Juno, power the entire region of space around those
dwarf planets. Ditto for the development of Selena and other planets
in the Kuiper belt.

So, you're not first had at much of anything. In fact at best it's
3rd or 4th hand expertise that's only understood well enough by
Willie.Moo, and yet your actions are clearly those of global energy
domination because, so little if anything you have to offer is
affordably doable, or much less beneficial to the lower 99.9% of
humanity, and we can just plain forget about our badly failing
environment because of lord Mook's actions are never going to
contribute squat of whatever we need the most, is endless tonnes of
your cheap and green hydrogen as LH2 fuel for the future of damn near
everything (including the making of 10X worth of NOx), except the
makings of h2o2 shall forever remain taboo because according to Mook
h2o2 is apparently good for nothing except powering toys.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have showed you why hydrogen peroxide is not a suitable primary
fuel. Its about 1/9th as energetic as gasoline and for fundamenetal
reaasons will always cost on the order of 3x the cost of gasoline at
100% concentration. So, you're talking about paying 27x as much for
hydrogen peroxide power as gasoline poiwer - so, again you are
projecting your bull*** on to me for some damned reason.

Now you have chosen to ignore FACTS - they are facts because they are
proven in laboratory tests. Not because they're written down - though
they are written down - people do that with facts. Not because I said
so - but I did point out here these facts - I tend to go back to facts
when someone makes an assertion - and rather than thank me for the
hard work I did analyzing your bull*** - even pointing out that a
hydrogen peroxide micro-turbine might out perform batteries in
portable applications. I even estimated the market size -$10 billions
per year - what do you do? You dis me and call me names and assert
things -without any proof- that you think makes me feel the way you
feel.

Fact is Brad nothing you could say could make me feel the way you feel
- because you are insane and I am not.

Get help lad, you need it.

As far as things being costly - $400 for a round trip to the moon is a
bargain. The development of a fleet of spacecraft as i describe here
- costing less than Project Apollo would open up Mars and the Moon to
colonization and industrial development. The other things I mentioned
would make power too cheap to meter, and enrich everyone's life with
materials drawn from across the solar system.

That's quite the opposite of putting a burden on the environment and
making things more costly.

Why you hope to portray astounding advances as something to ignore, is
beyond me.

Your out of context formulated nayism is noted. Just like we noted
the same about Hitler and nowadays our resident LLPOF warlord(GW
Bush).

And, in which future century without sufficient global energy to spare
are you talking about providing those cheap seats for going to/from
our moon?

BTW, before WWII when fuel-oil (diesel) was in the realm of 8 gallons
per dollar, and of today it's lucky if you can find a gallon for the
bargain price of $4, as such is merely a 32:1 ratio, or the same as
inflation worthy of 3,200% in merely a little over a half century, and
apparently that's not quite good enough for those of your brown-nosed
Exxon/ENRON kind.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I realize that the disjointed names and events you recount above seems
to make sense to your blighted way of thinking, but you should realize
that yet again you are shitting all over the conversation I want to
have spouting your crap - and to a sane person - what you say makes no
sense at all. Its really an embarassment for you Brad. Shut the ***
up and GET HELP son - its the best thing you could do. Get a life
before they come and take you away and heavily medicate you.

In other words, you can't afford to get specific because that alone
would require sharing too much of the whole truth and nothing but the
truth. I understand.

Back shortly before WWII, when the good old USD bought 8 gallons of
diesel with change to spare, and of nowadays we're lucky to find a $4
gallon, as such is only a 32:1 ratio of energy inflation, or merely
3200% inflation is worth our noting as to what the next half century
of energy inflation is going to bring in those higher prices for
everything. It's even getting spendy to kill off those mostly
innocent Muslims, so just think about how future spendy it's going to
get once we've started up WWIII.
.. - Brad Guth
.

Quantcast