Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker <ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
On 16 Jun, 17:00, charliexmur...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 16, 9:15 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't read do you. My contention is that the training is designed
to brutalise. It is designed to produce people who will go to Iraq as
"Beni al kalb". It also produces people who find it difficult to fit
into civilian society. What I am saying is this. :- "If you are beaten
up, and if the training your partner has received is a material
factor, as I believe it is, you have a legal case against the
Pentagon.
yes, I do, but not the crap, untrue stuff you read. Your contention
is wrong. your view of the world is warped by the little knothole
that you look out of.
There is no such training as you refer to. There is no widespread
spouse abuse as you say, much less due to training received.
There jolly well is. It is well attested by epdemiolical studies.
There are references to it. Getting a bit near home eh!
We see this syndrome all the time. The basic point for this group is
that no one is interested in truth. There was a posting way back when
I taked about the accuracy of measurment on earth crossing asteroids.
Nobody reoplied to that point. Rand replied to points about the US
Anthrax attacks, attacks which are well attested.
This underlnes what I have been saying all the time.
Another poster - Wallace Wright. He made one or two remarks on AI. I
thought here at least is a regard for the truth. But no, he clearly
did not understand what he had written. All he posted for was to get
at me. He admitted when I asked him about publications that he was
writing under a pseudoym. Really what can you say.
Wallace Wright was by far and away the most serious as it makes people
far more cautious and hampers the free exchange of ideas. This is all
what I mean.
Why simgle out Brad and kT. OK perhaps you have half a point with Brad
but kT only started posting after the sustained sluring of myself.
- Ian Parker
- Ian Parker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- References:
- Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Martha Adams
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: charliexmurphy
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- From: charliexmurphy
- Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- Prev by Date: Re: >>> another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" :) :) :) >>>
- Next by Date: Re: >>> another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" :) :) :) >>>
- Previous by thread: Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- Next by thread: Re: Re Willie Mookie and the crap posters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|