Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?


Has anyone of any importance outside of the mainstream status quo
cesspool of yes men and brown-nosed minions ever come to the same
agreement as with those notions of yours?

What notions are you talking about?

 Obviously not, as in not
even close,

??? Radiation levels? Mars Colonization? Lunar Colonization?
Venus Colonization?

as otherwise you wouldn't have been personally bothering
with Usenet/newsgroup postings, as you'd have a staff of servitude
minions doing it on your behalf.

I post personally to usenet - although I will say I was flirting with
a lovely blonde last night in Houston - but I have some meetings in
the mid-west this morning - and a major meeting Saturday in New York -
so, that'll all have to wait.

Obviously the notions of our terraforming Mars is not going to happen,

Yes it will.

especially since we've more than demonstrated that we can't even
manage Earth

Well that's another issue. Frontiers have a way of helping organize
the center. Look how America came to dominate the 20th century. Mars
will be the hope, and spirit of the 21st century.

or much less our moon that was supposedly made of Earth.

Was made you mean. We have the rocks to prove it.

Your lies and deceptions are

non-existant.

clearly based upon other lies of those
you admirer with every fiber of your black heart,

hahaha - they say the things you see in the world reflect things that
are going on in your psyche. That's something you should think about
as you re-read this stuff Brad. Why are you so unhappy? Ever wonder
about that? Its a choice YOU make- and is totally independent of
what's happening around you. Why are you unhappy Brad? It has
nothing to do with me, or the world, or anything off world. Its all
inside you. That's where you need to start.

whereas each lie

is non-existant.

begets another and another,

all non-existant.

and it seems our dumbfounded citizens

have you at the front leading the way.

of
this nation are still pretty much without a clue.

Well, most Americans don't know that their news is censored by the
military - starting in World War one - with a setback in the 20s -
then the Red Scare - caused censorship to be expanded in the 1940s -
and again after Vietnam. I think our bankers made mistakes in dealing
with the international market in part because they did not have good
data - about the international situation - due to this censorship.

What can I or most anyone else say?  

To you? Only two words - GET HELP

Obviously nothing can be said to
such a loyal Zionist/Nazi lover

nonsense.

and supporter like yourself and others
of your pretend-Atheism and politically neutral kind that hasn't an
honest bone nor would ever admit to having a clue as to how we'd
otherwise manage to keep 10,000 spare/surplus military and countless
civil service workers employed after WWII, when there was clearly no
good reason other than our mutually perpetrated cold-war.  

Hey, your ass would be a radioactive charcoal briquette right about
now if it wasn't for teh freaking cold war you ***! lol.

The same
argument as applied 10 fold greater in numbers for the USSR,

Which is also non-existant. You really get worked up over a lot of
imaginary things Brad.

as
becoming our tango partner in crimes against humanity.

Nonsense.


The resulting global fears

are in your head.

along with cultivated bigotry,

in your head.

racism,

in your head

hatreds

in your head again.

Its all in your head dude. Wake up and get happy.

of most all other sorts and of course having caused inflation

All we gotta do in the present time is;

NEAR TERM
1) eliminate taxes on capital gains
2) eliminate taxes on bank interest
3) eliminate taxes on bank deposits and capital

MIDDLE TERM
4) announce victory and withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan putting
OPEC in charge
5) reduce military spending from $600 billion /yr to $120 bilion /yr
over 8 yrs

LONG TERM
6) increase R&D in telerobotics and factory, farm and mining
automation
7) develop low cost hydrogen production using low cost solar and low
cost nuclear
a) use hydrogen in coal fired power plants eliminating half
carbon footprint
b) take stranded coal and add hydrogen to make 7 billion
barrels of syncrude
c) add syncrude to domestic crude - export 2 billion barrels
d) expand energy use with direct hydrogen fuel
e) export hydrogen to dominate future energy going forward


in just about everything is what subsequently transpired, not to
mention burning through the bulk of our fossil fuels and otherwise
trashing our global environment in the process,

You overstate the situation. The world burns;

28.3 billion barrels of crude oil
5.5 billion tons of coal
1.1 billion tons of natural gas

This is replaced by burning 3.3 billion tons of hydrogen gas made from
30 billion tons of water by high temperature electrolysis - either
powered by low cost solar panels or low cost high temperature nuclear
reactors. We could do that in five years if we wished. If we wanted
to do it piecemeal andmake money all along the way, we'd

1) generate hydrogen to supply coal and gas fired power plants
eliminating half our carbon emissions
2) take the stranded coal and gas to make liquid fuels with more
hydrogen
3) tax conventional oil out of existence.
4) as demand increases, fulfill it with hydrogen directly

This cuts our carbon foot print in half, and doubles our oil supply
made from coal and sunlight and sets up a long term transition to a
hydrogen economy.
..

plus multiple wars

Our over-reliance on military muscle must be addressed sooner rather
than later. The good news about the crash is that it means the US is
suffering from the same sort of economic difficulty in maintaining
super-power status as the former Soviet Union. Which is the point.
Schumpeter predicted collapse of ANY nation that over-spent on
military. USSR spent faster than the USA so it collapsed first. But
the USA was still at risk, so it collapsed later.

and
international fiascos

People make mistakes, that doesn't mean there's a plan to make them.
Although insane people cannot admit they make istakes so they get
rather creative in explaining away their mistakes - which makes
matters worse whether you believe them or not.


as having been created or made worse and/or
sustained longer.

Due to insanity yes.

 Don’t even try to suggest that our mainstream
religions had nothing to do with any of this,

Because they don't.

or that religion has no
part in cultivating or otherwise benefiting by way

Nope.

of their being in
charge

Definitely not. I don't see ministers in charge of much - except
their pulpits.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ

of what others are doing right under our noses, and then having
been sharing back to their global domination church a portion of the
artificial wealth generated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju3h7yk4Hcg&feature=related

Bicycle repairman is ready.

The perpetual mainstream damage-control argument(s) that no one or
multiple agencies of our government or that of any church/religion
related factors are actually in charge of or otherwise directly or
indirectly responsible for any of the global or local bad stuff, just
doesn’t hardly fly, because Muslim Gypsies or rogue cults simply can’t
be responsible for every bad and consequence thing that comes along.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ9myHhpS9s&NR=1

.