Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?

Why did you shut down our Usenet/newsgroups?

On Oct 3, 8:36 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Has anyone of any importance outside of the mainstream status quo
cesspool of yes men and brown-nosed minions ever come to the same
agreement as with those notions of yours?

What notions are you talking about?

Obviously not, as in not
even close,

??? Radiation levels? Mars Colonization? Lunar Colonization?
Venus Colonization?

as otherwise you wouldn't have been personally bothering
with Usenet/newsgroup postings, as you'd have a staff of servitude
minions doing it on your behalf.

I post personally to usenet - although I will say I was flirting with
a lovely blonde last night in Houston - but I have some meetings in
the mid-west this morning - and a major meeting Saturday in New York -
so, that'll all have to wait.

Obviously the notions of our terraforming Mars is not going to happen,

Yes it will.

especially since we've more than demonstrated that we can't even
manage Earth

Well that's another issue. Frontiers have a way of helping organize
the center. Look how America came to dominate the 20th century. Mars
will be the hope, and spirit of the 21st century.

or much less our moon that was supposedly made of Earth.

Was made you mean. We have the rocks to prove it.

Your lies and deceptions are

non-existant.

clearly based upon other lies of those
you admirer with every fiber of your black heart,

hahaha - they say the things you see in the world reflect things that
are going on in your psyche. That's something you should think about
as you re-read this stuff Brad. Why are you so unhappy? Ever wonder
about that? Its a choice YOU make- and is totally independent of
what's happening around you. Why are you unhappy Brad? It has
nothing to do with me, or the world, or anything off world. Its all
inside you. That's where you need to start.

whereas each lie

is non-existant.

begets another and another,

all non-existant.

and it seems our dumbfounded citizens

have you at the front leading the way.

of
this nation are still pretty much without a clue.

Well, most Americans don't know that their news is censored by the
military - starting in World War one - with a setback in the 20s -
then the Red Scare - caused censorship to be expanded in the 1940s -
and again after Vietnam. I think our bankers made mistakes in dealing
with the international market in part because they did not have good
data - about the international situation - due to this censorship.

What can I or most anyone else say?

To you? Only two words - GET HELP

Obviously nothing can be said to
such a loyal Zionist/Nazi lover

nonsense.

and supporter like yourself and others
of your pretend-Atheism and politically neutral kind that hasn't an
honest bone nor would ever admit to having a clue as to how we'd
otherwise manage to keep 10,000 spare/surplus military and countless
civil service workers employed after WWII, when there was clearly no
good reason other than our mutually perpetrated cold-war.

Hey, your ass would be a radioactive charcoal briquette right about
now if it wasn't for teh freaking cold war you ***! lol.

The same
argument as applied 10 fold greater in numbers for the USSR,

Which is also non-existant. You really get worked up over a lot of
imaginary things Brad.

as
becoming our tango partner in crimes against humanity.

Nonsense.

The resulting global fears

are in your head.

along with cultivated bigotry,

in your head.

racism,

in your head

hatreds

in your head again.

Its all in your head dude. Wake up and get happy.

of most all other sorts and of course having caused inflation

All we gotta do in the present time is;

NEAR TERM
1) eliminate taxes on capital gains
2) eliminate taxes on bank interest
3) eliminate taxes on bank deposits and capital

MIDDLE TERM
4) announce victory and withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan putting
OPEC in charge
5) reduce military spending from $600 billion /yr to $120 bilion /yr
over 8 yrs

LONG TERM
6) increase R&D in telerobotics and factory, farm and mining
automation
7) develop low cost hydrogen production using low cost solar and low
cost nuclear
a) use hydrogen in coal fired power plants eliminating half
carbon footprint
b) take stranded coal and add hydrogen to make 7 billion
barrels of syncrude
c) add syncrude to domestic crude - export 2 billion barrels
d) expand energy use with direct hydrogen fuel
e) export hydrogen to dominate future energy going forward

in just about everything is what subsequently transpired, not to
mention burning through the bulk of our fossil fuels and otherwise
trashing our global environment in the process,

You overstate the situation. The world burns;

28.3 billion barrels of crude oil
5.5 billion tons of coal
1.1 billion tons of natural gas

This is replaced by burning 3.3 billion tons of hydrogen gas made from
30 billion tons of water by high temperature electrolysis - either
powered by low cost solar panels or low cost high temperature nuclear
reactors. We could do that in five years if we wished. If we wanted
to do it piecemeal andmake money all along the way, we'd

1) generate hydrogen to supply coal and gas fired power plants
eliminating half our carbon emissions
2) take the stranded coal and gas to make liquid fuels with more
hydrogen
3) tax conventional oil out of existence.
4) as demand increases, fulfill it with hydrogen directly

This cuts our carbon foot print in half, and doubles our oil supply
made from coal and sunlight and sets up a long term transition to a
hydrogen economy.
.

plus multiple wars

Our over-reliance on military muscle must be addressed sooner rather
than later. The good news about the crash is that it means the US is
suffering from the same sort of economic difficulty in maintaining
super-power status as the former Soviet Union. Which is the point.
Schumpeter predicted collapse of ANY nation that over-spent on
military. USSR spent faster than the USA so it collapsed first. But
the USA was still at risk, so it collapsed later.

and
international fiascos

People make mistakes, that doesn't mean there's a plan to make them.
Although insane people cannot admit they make istakes so they get
rather creative in explaining away their mistakes - which makes
matters worse whether you believe them or not.

as having been created or made worse and/or
sustained longer.

Due to insanity yes.

Don’t even try to suggest that our mainstream
religions had nothing to do with any of this,

Because they don't.

or that religion has no
part in cultivating or otherwise benefiting by way

Nope.

of their being in
charge

Definitely not. I don't see ministers in charge of much - except
their pulpits.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ

of what others are doing right under our noses, and then having
been sharing back to their global domination church a portion of the
artificial wealth generated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju3h7yk4Hcg&feature=related

Bicycle repairman is ready.

The perpetual mainstream damage-control argument(s) that no one or
multiple agencies of our government or that of any church/religion
related factors are actually in charge of or otherwise directly or
indirectly responsible for any of the global or local bad stuff, just
doesn’t hardly fly, because Muslim Gypsies or rogue cults simply can’t
be responsible for every bad and consequence thing that comes along.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ9myHhpS9s&NR=1

Your continual focus upon the “Look how America came to dominate the
20th century. Mars will be the hope, and spirit of the 21st century”
is further proof positive where your mindset has blown a gasket. The
only global domination we Americans are responsible for is exactly the
same methodology that Hitler rather badly applied along with a great
deal of your Rothschild Zionist/Nazi help (fortunately it didn’t
take).

From time to time, you and your CIA World Fact Book actually allow
yourself to slip back into reality and to share or embellish upon the
truth:
“Well, most Americans don't know that their news is censored by the
military - starting in World War one - with a setback in the 20s -
then the Red Scare - caused censorship to be expanded in the 1940s -
and again after Vietnam. I think our bankers made mistakes in dealing
with the international market in part because they did not have good
data - about the international situation - due to this censorship.”

And our being without good data (such as with our DARPA/NASA Apollo
fiasco and much of everything since) is exactly the point of what I’ve
been informing yourself and others that think all is perfectly well
and good onboard our mainstream good ship USS LOLLIPOP, even though
it’s clearly sinking faster than you Zionist/Nazi boys can manage to
artificially inflate our global economy.

As per usual, the likes of yourself and John Savard are thoroughly
chuck full of it, as well as mainstream brown nosed as you can
possibly get. If Savard and the likes of lord all-knowing William
Mook had it their way, we’d have to put up with a dozen more public
funded agencies like our NASA with open-ended fuzzy accounting, having
little if any technology sharing or accountability nor hardly
otherwise a stitch of remorse, as you yourself many times so having
stipulated as to what’s wrong with the cabal/insider restricted way of
doing things, as well as per otherwise preventing others like your
pretending self from actually accomplishing squat.

I and others half as smart as a 5th grader should also know, that even
though the public assess to our interactive Usenet/newsgroups has
recently been trashed and/or suspended, it seems my stuff has still
been getting reviewed by those on the inside of Usenet, even though
the rest of us are not being allowed to see our replies, nor those of
others or even any new topics, all because the Google/NOVA servers of
Usenet/newsgroups are being artificially moderated or hacked to death
by those in charge of whatever the public gets to see.

I’m actually not all that surprised, because if I were in charge of
DARPA and the likes of MI5/CIA damage-control, it’s certainly what I’d
be doing as damage-control via hacking or otherwise terminating this
public interactive Usenet/newsgroup medium.

It seems only shortly after I’d posted by usual replies to those of us
unable or by way of their MI5/CIA policy or via faith denied the right
to deductively think for themselves, is when our Google/NOVA Usenet of
public newsgroups suddenly became rather useless and otherwise locked
down by those in charge (namely DARPA).

I’m not taking all the credit because, there had also been so much
mainstream injected clownism by those having posted hundreds of bogus
and otherwise intentionally misleading topics along with even more
bogus kinds of subject headers, such as those of contributor “gb…..”
as having posted solid blocks of topic/subject index context, in that
perhaps no way could these Usenet/newsgroup servers deal with all the
“search for” combinations when given that much index of block subject
context per bogus topic.

It seems a simple modification as to whatever can or at least of how
much can be given within the subject or topic index is a Usenet
programming no brainer, that is if DARPA actually wanted to better
manage this Usenet of public unmoderated newsgroups, as perhaps
limited to the index subject title of 72 characters and more limited
as to subject title changing seems rather doable, whereas perhaps the
only subject/title revision restricted as to the original topic
author, rather than allowing just anyone to make such debauchery
loaded changes on the fly.

Btw, our NASA has actually been getting their dirty hands on a whole
lot more of our hard earned public loot than GAO reported, and I’d say
at times it’s to the tune of getting as much as ten fold more of our
loot than ever shows up on any public accounting. On the other hand,
it seems Canada is certainly energy and other wise talent and resource
rich, as John Savard and William Mook would certainly agree there’s no
shortage of spare/surplus public loot or the necessary resources for
having created that new and improved fleet of shuttles. So, if not
for cloak and dagger or any number of cover thy mutually perpetrated
cold-war and NASA/Apollo *** reasons, what exactly has been the big
hold up?

Secondly, yourself and most others of your mainstream infomercial
spewing kind have known darn good what having a “Clarke Station” or
some other space platform oasis, depot or gateway use of our Selene/
moon-L1 (Earth-moon L1) would have accomplished a whole lot of good
for everyone as of decades ago, and perhaps initially at not 10% the
all-inclusive cost of our DARPA Apollo fiasco, not to mention the vast
and far reaching benefits of what my LSE-CM/ISS represents. At best
you bipolar folks are nothing but hypocrites, and at worse nothing but
the very worse that humanity has to offer.

In the mean time, our Usenet/newsgroups are either made ineffective or
entirely broken, as will be the case each and every time the
mainstream status quo needs to perform further damage-control, and if
you want to believe there’s not a faith-based motivated fiber of media
and government influence or control, then perhaps for the very first
time in recorded terrestrial history that may be the case, in that you
simply can’t manage to prove any better than proving Muslims ever had
any real cache of WMD (most certainly at best not worth 0.1% of
whatever your faith-based government has always had in WMD to work
with). Apparently William Mook is also color blind, because you can’t
seem to see the blood of mostly innocent Muslims on your hands or the
surrounding collateral damage and global inflation caused by those of
your blood sucking kind.

“People make mistakes, that doesn't mean there's a plan to make them.
Although insane people cannot admit they make istakes so they get
rather creative in explaining away their mistakes - which makes
matters worse whether you believe them or not.”

I can only somewhat agree, with the minor exception that sane folks
making those unintentional as well as educated and/or calculated
intentional mistakes, and then use our public funding and multiple
other public cabal/cartel resources in order to PR media hype only
their interpretation, and to otherwise cover their butts and the butts
of all those conspiring for a share of the stolen pie that you seem to
favor the “finders keepers, losers weepers” status quo, simply because
it’s past history.

If the history of mankind can not be honestly reported and otherwise
merely revised in order to reflect the best available truths, then
there’s no good way of preventing future atrocities or to otherwise
prevent the sorts of debauchery that you and others of your kind
clearly see nothing wrong with.

Btw again, let us remind ourselves that I’m still in favor of pushing
renewable energy to the max, therefore I’m on your side of creating
those clean electrons and multiple synfuels (including h2o2) along
with better ICE alternatives than otherwise limited as to using up our
badly polluted atmosphere of mostly nitrogen. I’m also in favor of
creating the most affordable clean and failsafe residential and
commercial energy to the best of what modern technology and resources
can muster, which means there’s not going to be all that much trickle-
up loot to be taken by those of your kind.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
.

Loading