Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Jochem Huhmann <joh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:55:41 +0100
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
dumpster4@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
See:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/STAGE010909.xml&headline=SpaceX%20Aims%20For%202009%20Re-usability%20Demo&channel=space
I hope it goes well.
They will have a hell of a time figuring out how to get that second
stage back down in one piece.
This would be a good point to finally try active cooling. Let the fuel
tank heat up and design in pressure-controlled valves that vent residual
(vaporized) fuel over the skin of the stage, cooling it and protecting
it from the plasma. I have always thought that this is the best way to
get anything mainly consisting of large and nearly empty fuel tanks
intact through reentry.
Jochem
--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- References:
- SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: dumpster4
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Pat Flannery
- SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Prev by Date: Re: Ares vs Atlas or Delta
- Next by Date: Article about Direct - Jupiter on Popular Mechanics, sorry gaetano !
- Previous by thread: Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Next by thread: Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading