Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:35:22 -0600
Jochem Huhmann wrote:
This would be a good point to finally try active cooling. Let the fuel
tank heat up and design in pressure-controlled valves that vent residual
(vaporized) fuel over the skin of the stage, cooling it and protecting
it from the plasma. I have always thought that this is the best way to
get anything mainly consisting of large and nearly empty fuel tanks
intact through reentry.
But you are going to have to keep it stable as far as orientation goes during reentry, and that's probably going to mean spinning it up so a nose-mounted heatshield/active cooling system stays pointy-end first as it comes in...given it's shape that may not be easy.
Since the only expensive things on it are the guidance electronics and engine, it might be smarter to mount the electronics back at the tail end of the stage near the engine, and just have that section come down via parachute while the propellant tankage is allowed to burn up. That would certainly save a lot of weight on the parachute system.
Pat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Jochem Huhmann
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- References:
- SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: dumpster4
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- From: Jochem Huhmann
- SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Prev by Date: Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Next by Date: Re: Article about Direct - Jupiter on Popular Mechanics, sorry gaetano !
- Previous by thread: Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Next by thread: Re: SpaceX Aims For 2009 Re-usability Demo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|