Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:14:10 -0500
"Len Lekx" <LFLekx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ij72o4tia6l6hfnoss42k16sh38es5jb4j@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:30:42 +0100, jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Building something that spins and generates 1 g like in 2001 means itsExactly. That is why human space travel will have to wait
going to have to be huge, as studies have shown that unless it's around
400' in diameter the crew are going to get sick as they move around
until we can build huge spaceships.
Not really - put two ship-sections on the end of a tether, and swing
them around their center-of-mass like a bolo. You've got gravity AND
a small ship.
And other issues. Such as how do you perform in-flight maneuvers?
And what happens if you can't keep the line taught.
We definitely need to do more research in this area before we can claim it's
easy.
--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- References:
- Another problem with longer flights
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Another problem with longer flights
- From: Len Lekx
- Another problem with longer flights
- Prev by Date: Re: Another problem with longer flights
- Next by Date: Re: Another problem with longer flights
- Previous by thread: Re: Another problem with longer flights
- Next by thread: Re: Another problem with longer flights
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|