Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode
From: Neil Gerace (geracen_at_iinet.net.au)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Joshua Hesse: "Re: Why would Kerry wearing a cleanroom suit matter?"
- Previous message: Ted Molczan: "Re: Why would Kerry wearing a cleanroom suit matter?"
- In reply to: Dr John Stockton: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Next in thread: Mike Dicenso: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Reply: Mike Dicenso: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:48:14 +0800
"Dr John Stockton" <spam@merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:d+XbjXE9oWCBFwOw@merlyn.demon.co.uk...
> I don't recall an HMS Titanic; though there may have been one at some
> time. The Cunarder was RMS Titanic; the difference is significant.
White Star Line, not Cunard, IIRC. The liner Carpathia that (eventually)
picked up survivors was a Cunard ship.
RMS = Royal Mail Ship, a privately-owned ship which carries Royal Mail under
government contract.
RMA = Royal Mail Aircraft.
- Next message: Joshua Hesse: "Re: Why would Kerry wearing a cleanroom suit matter?"
- Previous message: Ted Molczan: "Re: Why would Kerry wearing a cleanroom suit matter?"
- In reply to: Dr John Stockton: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Next in thread: Mike Dicenso: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Reply: Mike Dicenso: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: "Enterprise" to honor the Columbia crew with season 4's 3rd episode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
