Re: Whats nasa thinking
From: Jorge R. Frank (jrfrank_at_ibm-pc.borg)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Mike Scott: "Re: Bird strikes"
- Previous message: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: OT: taxation (was Re: Mountains Rush and Moore)"
- In reply to: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Next in thread: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Reply: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:58:58 -0500
hallerb@aol.com (bob haller) wrote in
news:20040829212617.16420.00000008@mb-m05.aol.com:
> Should we be partnered with a country thats spreading nuclear weapons
> to possible terrorists that might use those bombs here.
Of course not. Now, explain to us why you advocated sending that same
country billions of dollars in your post less than 24 hours ago.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Bob Haller!
-- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM.
- Next message: Mike Scott: "Re: Bird strikes"
- Previous message: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: OT: taxation (was Re: Mountains Rush and Moore)"
- In reply to: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Next in thread: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Reply: bob haller: "Re: Whats nasa thinking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]