Re: The Moon, LSE-CM/ISS, Venus and beyond, with He3 to burn

From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/27/05

  • Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: The Moon, LSE-CM/ISS, Venus and beyond, with He3 to burn" 
    Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 04:10:37 +0000 (UTC)

    Garuda,
    I'm not saying that folks like yourself shouldn't remain guarded, as the
    last thing we need is for the status quo of our resident blood sucking
    warlords and of all their snookered mainstreamers backing those
    warloards that are currently intent upon justifying our going after
    global control of the remaining natural gas and oil reserves, whereas to
    even think of allowing those perverted morons ever touching our moon
    that's offering humanity the sort of potential that the likes of
    ENRON/Andersen and Bush/Cheney and their partners in crimes against
    humanity would lie their stinking butts off and literally kill for such
    profits from helium-3, or perhaps best upon devising another bogus
    dog-wagging method of keeping it from ever being utilized until the very
    last m3 of their natural gas and the last spendy drop of their polluting
    oil gets sold to the highest bidder, is entirely imoral.

    What I'm trying to suggest is that we go for developing the necessary
    fly-by-rocket lander technology and also go about the task of relocating
    ISS to the moon as soon as possible, establishing our claim upon the
    ME-L1 zone, as well as dominating everyting that's between Earth and
    that zone, plus totally lord over the lunar terratory below, with the
    focused intent of pillaging the moon to a fairlywell.

    Extracting He3/3He and exporting that substance to Earth should have
    become priority-1 decades ago. Whereas He3 arrivial upon Earth and
    subsequent placement into clean fusion reactors, lo and behold the value
    of natural gas and oil should fall into the nearest toilet (I'd like to
    see $10/barrel or less), taking the buying power away from those
    continually profiting at the demise of humanity, while at the same time
    giving the less fortunate nations an affordable source of relatively
    cheap natural gas and oil that'll be in good surplus ever since the
    really big energy sucking nations of this world have switched over to
    primarily fusion.

    If the free world was primarily fusion based, secondly nuclear, thirdly
    hydroelectric and the remainder as solar and wind energy, that plus
    whatever a few nations that can already develop and export as liquified
    hydrogen seems to be suggesting that we can start telling the oil rich
    to go stuff it.

    I'd like to think/dream that America is going to get itself smart enough
    as to become 75% fusion, with the remainder as 15% hydroelectric and 10%
    from the likes of solar and wind energy, thus nothing need be nuclear
    and not another drop of imported oil need be obtained, much less burned
    off in order to produce energy at the continuing risk of creating so
    darn much artificial CO2.

    Spare/surplus energy from the likes of clean fusion, hydroelectric,
    solar and wind can go into producing, storing and distributing hydrogen.
    In our case the existing gas and oil reserves on American soil or under
    our coastal waters should be sufficient for many centuries to come,
    affording sufficient and cheaper fuel oil for heavy machinery and
    aircraft that can't as of yet operate directly from fusion, nor afforde
    the space requirements of burning H2. Although, the likes of H2O2/C12H26
    would certainly improve things by way of extending the fuel oil energy
    output 7.5:1, and to think that it only takes a resource of clean energy
    in order to manufacture the likes of H2O2 (that sort of fuel can fly).

    BTW; there's all sorts of absolutely nifty advantages and technological
    benefits as well as improvements to the environment for using
    H2O2/C12H26 within IRRC engines that are extremely compact, energy
    conversion efficient and extra clean burning. The IRRCE isn't science
    fiction, it's not even science future, it's actually been science placed
    on hold for the past several decades because it's so darn good and, for
    all the right reasons the right sort of thing that we should have been
    doing from the very get-go.

    Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm 

    -- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  • Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: The Moon, LSE-CM/ISS, Venus and beyond, with He3 to burn"
    • Quantcast