Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics
From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Previous message: Jim Oberg: "Re: MSNBC (Oberg) - Deadly space lessons go unheeded"
- In reply to: sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com: "Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Next in thread: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Reply: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:36:24 GMT
In article <1107051069.512974.97130@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
<sawlake-gg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The debate on saving Hubble may take a new turn -- Ground based
>telescopes with adaptive optics are out-doing the aging Hubble...
It's not news that they can outdo Hubble in some respects, especially when
raw light-gathering power is important (since some of those scopes have an
order of magnitude more mirror area).
Hubble continues to be superior -- and likely to stay that way -- in other
respects, such as ultraviolet performance and dark sky background.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net
- Next message: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Previous message: Jim Oberg: "Re: MSNBC (Oberg) - Deadly space lessons go unheeded"
- In reply to: sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com: "Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Next in thread: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Reply: Joe D.: "Re: Hubble beaten by ground based adaptive optics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]