Re: Previous NASA Administrators
lifeform1_at_atlantic.net
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Dale: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Previous message: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- In reply to: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Next in thread: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Reply: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Reply: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Feb 2005 22:14:52 -0800
February 17, 2005
Revision wrote:
> > big way, and investigate all those
> > fossils on Mars. The moon and the
> > asteroids would follow in short order.
>
> > Thomas Lee Elifritz
> > http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
>
> There are no credible or peer-reviewed reports in re: fossils on
Mars,
> though recent news is that some scientists are claiming that Mars
methane
> is of current biological origin. Let's not confuse Weekly World News
for
> JPL investigators.. please.
Go *** yourself.
Peer review literature is simply one of many reservoirs
of knowledge at our disposal from which we build models.
Fossils will exist or not exist independent of the
peer review literature, ***.
Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
- Next message: Dale: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Previous message: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- In reply to: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Next in thread: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Reply: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Reply: Revision: "Re: Previous NASA Administrators"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]