Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle
From: Jorge R. Frank (jrfrank_at_ibm-pc.borg)
Date: 03/26/05
- Previous message: Andrew Lotosky: "Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle"
- In reply to: Jeff Findley: "Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:15:00 -0600
"Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@ugs.nojunk.com> wrote in
news:13ff9$42447f51$927a2ce9$17326@FUSE.NET:
> "Reunite Gondwanaland" <reunite.gondwana@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ico841139ofpi1f6jthhf9vls3bedopn12@4ax.com...
>>
>> "Dusty" is an understatement, by the way.
>
> I was waiting for Mary or Henry to respond to this. ;-)
>
> The "incredible mess", as Mary put it, has to be the biggest reason that
> there has only been one landing at White Sands.
Of course, it's not a factor in this scenario. Remember, we are talking
about an orbiter that is already *known* to be compromised. Even assuming
it lands intact, that bird will never fly again. So cleaning up the
"incredible mess" would become the Smithsonian's problem, not NASA's.
-- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM.
- Previous message: Andrew Lotosky: "Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle"
- In reply to: Jeff Findley: "Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|