Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle

From: Jorge R. Frank (jrfrank_at_ibm-pc.borg)
Date: 03/26/05

  • Next message: Keith F. Lynch: "Re: MMU Question"
    Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:15:00 -0600
    
    

    "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@ugs.nojunk.com> wrote in
    news:13ff9$42447f51$927a2ce9$17326@FUSE.NET:

    > "Reunite Gondwanaland" <reunite.gondwana@gmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:ico841139ofpi1f6jthhf9vls3bedopn12@4ax.com...
    >>
    >> "Dusty" is an understatement, by the way.
    >
    > I was waiting for Mary or Henry to respond to this. ;-)
    >
    > The "incredible mess", as Mary put it, has to be the biggest reason that
    > there has only been one landing at White Sands.

    Of course, it's not a factor in this scenario. Remember, we are talking
    about an orbiter that is already *known* to be compromised. Even assuming
    it lands intact, that bird will never fly again. So cleaning up the
    "incredible mess" would become the Smithsonian's problem, not NASA's.

    -- 
    JRF
    Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
    check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
    think one step ahead of IBM.
    

  • Next message: Keith F. Lynch: "Re: MMU Question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle
      ... Jeff Findley wrote: ... > there has only been one landing at White Sands. ... had been scheduled for KSC but diverted). ... much of a "last resort" White Sands has been seen as. ...
      (sci.space.shuttle)
    • Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?
      ... Thanks David. ... I would have said (without watching other missions) that it was cutting ... their training for landing would have featured Edwards AFB and possibly ... even KSC's SLF) - high winds at White Sands had already delayed the ...
      (sci.space.history)
    • Re: And what about civilian Shuttle casualties?
      ... >> orbiter, because the gypsum dust is only a problem for processing for ... A given landing site can be approached from the ... and from each direction the crossrange ... White Sands has the lower ...
      (sci.space.shuttle)
    • Re: The ding in the tile
      ... so White Sands it is. ... Doesn't all of these scenerios put the shuttle over populated land at some ... but there's not a helluva lot of population below a landing track ...
      (sci.space.shuttle)
    • Re: Sounds Like an Orbiter Can Be Brought Down Without a Crew
      ... this was yet another reason that in such a scenario ... White Sands or Edwards would be used. ...
      (sci.space.shuttle)