Re: Perhaps there's hope for NASA yet



"Herb Schaltegger" <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:0001HW.BE8174CE0326C2EDF02845B0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From testimony at Griffin's confirmation hearing:
>
> "With regard to the Crew Exploration Vehicle, Griffin noted that in the
> 1960s the Gemini program took only three years and the development of
> the Apollo capsule only about 6 years from award to fruition. He said
> 2014 is too far out for flying for the first time a vehicle he compared
> to the Apollo capsule.
>
> ³'President Bush said no later than 2014. He didn¹to say we couldn¹to be
> smart and do it early,' Griffin told members of the Commerce Committee.
> 'That would be my goal. It is unacceptable to me that it should take
> from 2005 to 2014 to do the same thing² the country did during the
> 1960s.'"
>
> <http://space.com/news/griffin_hearing_050412.html>
>
>
> --
> Herb Schaltegger, GPG Key ID: BBF6FC1C
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> <http://www.angryherb.net>
>

But, then there was a kind of goal that was very well defined, i.e., land on
the moon and come back in the decade.

This time, surely, the emulation of what was done then is not the goal. If
the goal is longer stays and a versatile vehicle for shall we say, other
uses, then someone has got to define whether its one vehicle, several, or
whatever.

For what reason do you want to stay on the moon? Last time it seemed, that
at every place they went it was much the same. They surely need to visit the
poles and the other side.

If those are all the same as well, why do you want to be there?

I'd be much more interested in what will be done to protect people out there
from radiation. It seems this is the one thing that could scupper the whole
'human' side to exploration.

Brian

--

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: What is the Crew Exploration Vehicle supposed to be?
    ... > mention of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. ... > it a capsule + rocket combination? ... modules analogous to an Apollo service module. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Perhaps theres hope for NASA yet
    ... > until the new vehicle is ready to fly. ... "Mr. Griffin, who currently heads the space department of Johns Hopkins ... between the end of the space shuttle program and the launch of the new ... currently designated as the Crew Exploration Vehicle, ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Building Real Spaceships
    ... on the moon and mars from which commercial activities will arise. ... without any additional use of propellant. ... but creates a nightmare of different vehicle ... I have suggested a 45,000 ton spacecraft which requires 63,000 tons at ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: What if we still had Saturn V
    ... ::::: vehicle to perform it. ... Bush wants to go back to the moon. ... ::::Saturn V-equivalent replacement. ... We don't need a lift vehicle to go back to the Moon. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: What if we still had Saturn V
    ... :::: vehicle to perform it. ... Bush wants to go back to the moon. ... :::Saturn V-equivalent replacement. ... We don't need a lift vehicle to go back to the Moon. ...
    (sci.space.policy)