Re: Perhaps there's hope for NASA yet



In article <4261904c.13470540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>...Once station assembly is complete -- which
>>will be done with the shuttle -- there is no particular requirement for
>>single big lumps of station cargo.
>
>Of course we'll never want to build a second station.

The correct statement is: after the hash they made of the first one, of
course NASA will never be funded to build a second space station.

In any case, the right way to handle building a second station is to
include a *station-based* tug as part of the first load.

>>A modest manned spacecraft with a bit of cargo capacity and the ability
>>to fly cheaply and frequently could do an excellent job of station resupply.
>
>Unless we need to fly up any heavy components... Like a CMG.

Something like a CMG is not "heavy" in the sense of requiring a dedicated
Atlas V Heavy launch. Said modest manned spacecraft should be designed --
such designs have been done in the past -- to be able to trade off
passenger capacity for cargo capacity, with enough total payload mass to
carry the singlest largest item that might be needed for repair/resupply.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do cargo-hauling astronauts really lift 15 tons?
    ... In the weightless environment of space, ... delivered to the international space station by the shuttle Discovery. ... Does the cargo really weigh that much? ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Re: Do cargo-hauling astronauts really lift 15 tons?
    ... > In the weightless environment of space, keeping track of "weight" seems to ... > delivered to the international space station by the shuttle Discovery. ... > Does the cargo really weigh that much? ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Do cargo-hauling astronauts really lift 15 tons?
    ... In the weightless environment of space, keeping track of "weight" seems to ... delivered to the international space station by the shuttle Discovery. ... Does the cargo really weigh that much? ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Re: NASA gets SGI 2048-core Itanium 2 supercomputer
    ... It can bring huge cargo wich humans than then install with the canadian made manipulator arm. ... They were able to bring it back to earth on teh shuttle to analyse why it failed. ... the USA realised that one of the biggest problems were the smaller hatches as well as inability to return equipment that was no longer needed which ended up cluttering the station. ... To this end, the USA segment of the space station was designed with the large CBM hatches, and the MPLM "containers" that allow full racks of equipment and large items to be flown up by shuttle, berthed with the arm to the station's large hatches and then have the contents moved. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Favoritre anime starships
    ... >> Planetes's Station 7? ... >> in the weightless hub)? ... >The train is for moving cargo. ... The corridor curving to the side, ...
    (rec.arts.anime.misc)

Quantcast