Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Peter Joseph <kneecaps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:15:33 +0100
ghost@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
There's no need for you to be difficult. Actually, this should be easy for you. I believe I've laid out in this thread all the requisite facts for the comments and discussion which I seek on this particular (frustum) subject.
Right, I see what you mean.
I will say that I think it's significant, for starters, that you think the NASA-unidentified frustum "looks" more to you like NASA's left frustum than NASA's right one. Surely you've spotted *something* about the (UPI) frustum which prevents you from making a more positive identification.
Actually, I think I got my wires crossed, the damaged fustrum which is alleged to be the Right fustrum does look very much like the fustrum in the UPI photo. Yes, there are some possible differences, but its fairly inconclusive based on the quality of the photo.
By the way, if you think I'm nothing more than a fanciful old conspiracy theorist, why are you wasting your time here? I straightforwardly appealed to those who don't want to see any more wasted shuttles and astronauts, without independent verification of the Rogers conclusions.
No, its not that as such, I've just been listening to 'Moon Hoax' etc stories for years (99.9% of which are easily debunked). Its difficult at first to see any credibillity in these cover up ideas.
However for the record I'm not particularly interested in uncovering any cover ups as such. I'm interested in the facts and what actually happend (cover-up or no).
I have to agree from looking at your site and some other sources that the Left SRB / Right SRB, Crossover / No Crossover is an interesting line of investigation. However I'm uncertain how the paths the SRBs took during the explosion could rule out the Aft Field joint burn through.
Also I don't see how the Aft RCS jets firing could have aggravated any leak....the Aft yaw jets don't fire in anything like the direction of the external tank. The main engines are burning closer to the ET than the RCS jets.
I'd like to know where there is more information available for me to digest.
Peter Joseph
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- References:
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Peter Joseph
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Prev by Date: is there a newer STSPlus version or similar?
- Next by Date: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Previous by thread: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Next by thread: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Index(es):