Challenger
- From: Craig Fink <WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:19:08 GMT
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 05:30:34 -0700, ghost@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2000-001422.jpg
> <http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v1p24.htm>
Yeah, really kind of amazing it held together for so long. The leak sealed
itself up after the SRBs quit bending from the liftoff transient (twang).
Probably would have made it to SRB seperation, if the wind/flight
control induced bending hadn't opened it up again.
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenger
- From: Craig Fink
- Re: Challenger
- References:
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Peter Joseph
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Peter Joseph
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: Jon S. Berndt
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Prev by Date: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Next by Date: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Previous by thread: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Next by thread: Re: Challenger
- Index(es):