Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:23:33 GMT
John Doe <jdoe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Derek Lyons wrote:
>> If you bother to aquaint yourself with the actual planning
>> documents... You'll find no hard date. You will find a mission and a
>> goal whose completion marks the end of Shuttle operations.
>
>Why then have the media been given strong indications that 2010 was a
>hard date ?
Since when has the media had any more clue than you?
>Why has NASA indicated it would start soon to review contracts so that
>the shuttle can be mothballed by 2010.
>
>Why is 2010 repeated over and over again ?
Because you do need a date to plan around in terms of fiscal years
etc.
>Why not state that "shuttle will be mothballed once the 28 missions are
>complete". ?
Because it's not certain that 28 is the proper number. It could be 27
or it could be 29.
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- References:
- Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: Homer J. Fong
- Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: Ray S
- Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: John Doe
- Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- From: John Doe
- Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- Prev by Date: Re: Space Shuttle story on 60 Minutes Wed. tonight
- Next by Date: Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- Previous by thread: Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- Next by thread: Re: Chicken *** NASA (was Re: Hubble good as dead)
- Index(es):