Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: "ghost@xxxxxxxxx" <john.maxson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 May 2005 08:04:06 -0700
David Skinner wrote:
>
> the presence of gaseous hydrogen outside of the SRB, burning
> or not, can have no effect on whether O-rings produce black
> smoke when burned by the Hot gases inside a running SRB.
That wasn't the point. The tests proved that as soon as O-ring smoke
encounters gaseous hydrogen, the color black (never seen *prior* to
that point) is rendered invisible.
Consider this. How long after t+59 seconds should we see black smoke
from a resumed O-ring burnthrough, assuming no hydrogen leak nearby?
Would you say until five or ten seconds after fireball exit? If not,
what produces the black smoke seen in the flare at that late point?
(See, for example, E207 photos at <www.mission51l.com/apreview.htm>.)
In 1997, I performed rudimentary spectral inversion on a post-X photo
of that blackened flare (taken from camera E201). I tried the inversion
because the E201 FOIA film has an unusual blue hue throughout. I used
Adobe Photoshop, after a digital conversion. I printed both the before
and after frames, with a cheap color printer.
I have a local friend who is extremely busy with seasonal work right
now, in addition to his regular job. When he has more time, he can scan
both copies for proof here.
Spectral inversion shows the normal booster exhaust (the contrail) as a
beautiful dark blue (or indigo). It will come as a big surprise to you,
but the flare shows up as black; i.e., there are two distinct colors --
a black flare, on a contrail background of dark blue.
Furthermore, NASA staunchly refused to release even *one* original 70
mm film frame to Kodak Laboratories in New York, for a *professional*
spectral analysis. (NASA's 70 mm film was designed for Kodak's spectral
analysis, by the way.)
> Yes, really... I have done the research... I recently read almost
> every message in this group dating back to June 2003, including all
> of yours. Yesterday I took the 2 publicly available LH vs RH SRB
> Chamber Pressure comparison charts, listed as Figures 41 & 43 at:
> http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3appn.htm#n5, converted their
> GMT times to MET and overlayed a grid to make them readable.
<snip>
> With just these 2 portions of the trace, I have to assume they chose
> to just highlight the noticeable changes to the average... In this
> case: MET 21.7s where the average difference changes from ~0.13% to
> ~1% MET 61s where the average difference changes from ~1% to ~1.7%
> MET 67s where the average difference changes from ~1.7% to ~2.2%
> MET 68.5s where the average difference changes from ~2.2% to an
> exponential increase just prior to Structural Breakup.
Since you assumed, did you consider the possibility that NASA showed
you only what they wanted you to see, in the form they wanted you to
see it? Check out:
<www.mission51l.com/plot.htm> and
<www.mission51l.com/disaster.htm>.
> Unless your 'FOIA evidence' provides more data AND you actually
> show it to us, not just talk about it, your the one in error...
See <http://tinyurl.com/ckuku>, for an example. Maybe you missed it.
Challenger's Ghost
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- References:
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: David Skinner
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- From: David Skinner
- Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Prev by Date: Re: Delta IV Manned Launches from Florida Space Launch Complex 37
- Next by Date: Re: Radar on spacecraft
- Previous by thread: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Next by thread: Re: The Challenger Cover-Up -- NASA's Unidentified 51-L Frustum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
