Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- From: "ghost@xxxxxxxxx" <john.maxson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 May 2005 11:08:00 -0700
What you gather from the biased CAIB report doesn't change a thing I
said. Anybody with reasoning ability should recognize that, even if you
can't. It remains a pity that your post wasn't "spot-on" with your
reference-link.
Challenger's Ghost
Jim Oberg wrote:
> The radar tracks from NORAD were analyzed after the
> disaster, and the characteristics of the source of the echo
> were spot-on with a piece of RCC and support rib. Or
> didn't you read that part of the CAIB final report?
>
> The wider theme is that a more aggressive situational awareness
> of objects near any humanned space vehicle is a 'good thing'.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- From: Jim Oberg
- Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- From: ghost@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- From: Jim Oberg
- If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- Prev by Date: Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- Next by Date: NASA requiring SSN for media accreditation
- Previous by thread: Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- Next by thread: Re: If Columbia crew had only spotted the 'UFO' -- their RCC fragment drifting away....
- Index(es):