Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- From: Damon Hill <damon16ONE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:35:00 -0500
"Mike Dennis" <mapson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:BgUxe.33224$IL3.22569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Does anyone know of any work toward an RS-68 derived axial
> aerospike engine? Wouldn't it likely reduce the weight and
> throttle range for an expendable launcher--and therefore
> cost?
The RS-68 is a lowered-cost medium performance engine; the
only proposed derivative I'm aware of is replacing the
ablatively cooled exhaust nozzle with a regeneratively cooled
nozzle. I assume that would permit slightly higher chamber
pressure and an improved specific impulse--compared to the
SSME, it's pretty mediocre at sea level and even in vacuum.
But it's much cheaper to build.
I don't see how a more complex aerospike nozzle would have
the benefits you envision. It would improve Isp, which would
be a plus. I'm not aware of >any< plans to work with aerospike
nozzles on any large engines, anywhere.
I'd rather go with COBRA:
http://www.pratt-whitney.com/prod_space_cobra.asp
Have you heard of any specific plans to upgrade the RS-68?
--Damon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- From: John
- Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- From: Mike Dennis
- Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- References:
- RS-68 Aerospike
- From: Mike Dennis
- RS-68 Aerospike
- Prev by Date: RS-68 Aerospike
- Next by Date: Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- Previous by thread: RS-68 Aerospike
- Next by thread: Re: RS-68 Aerospike
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|