Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:13:44 -0500
"Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:X4oJe.84044$G8.17156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> On many Communications on this mission they seem to have had to
> reboot the systems to get a machine called proshare visible on the
> ground in order to transfer data. What version of Windows are they
> using?Sounds like 98, surely not!!
It's 98SE. They really need to replace the laptops before they can upgrade
the OS; the 760XDs just don't have the muscle to run anything more modern.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Jochem Huhmann
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- References:
- computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Brian Gaff
- computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-Entry time GMT?
- Next by Date: Re: Tongue in Cheek Foam Solution
- Previous by thread: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Next by thread: Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|