Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Jochem Huhmann <joh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:49:52 +0200
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:X4oJe.84044$G8.17156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> On many Communications on this mission they seem to have had to
>> reboot the systems to get a machine called proshare visible on the
>> ground in order to transfer data. What version of Windows are they
>> using?Sounds like 98, surely not!!
>
> It's 98SE. They really need to replace the laptops before they can upgrade
> the OS; the 760XDs just don't have the muscle to run anything more
> modern.
Should have more than enough oomph to run some Linux. Seriously. Could
easily save some man-hours per flight. Give those machines and the
functionality required to me and I'll work something out for a
reasonable price. Too cheap for government work, probably. Well. I've
been biting my desk more than once over the crew not having a simple
UUCP system up. And a mail server and some FTP and lots of specialized
GUI thingies. Did that on 486-class machines and they never missed a
beat. Try that with MS Windows 98 and you get what you deserve. Why
don't they try at least Solaris for these?
Jochem
--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- References:
- computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Tire made Columbia fail
- Next by Date: Re: What has NASA done for the Earth?
- Previous by thread: Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Next by thread: Re: computer network on Discovery unreliable?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|