Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- From: Rusty <reuben_barton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:17:51 -0700
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:36:57 +0200, "Capcom"
<capcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>zinyobserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> One of the possible (temporary) solutions to this problem is to apply
>> over foam a highly-tear-resistant and flexible external coating
>> (skin). In addition, to smother a lift-off, a current vehicle
>> stabilization control system must be replaced by a system with
>> significantly shortened reaction time. As a possible candidate, I see
>> a system based on the (http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.AI/0411015)
>> "Bounded-Input Bounded-PREDEFINED-Control Bounded-Output" approach.
>
>No use simply a net on the tank as FRF on STS 1
>http://www.capcomespace.net/dossiers/espace_US/shuttle/1981-85/1981%20STS1%20FRF%2002.jpg
Mount boost protective covers on the nose cap and leading edges of the
wings. Eject the covers once the tank is gone and the shuttle is in
orbit.
Rusty
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- References:
- Possible ET foam solutions
- From: zinyobserver
- Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- From: Capcom
- Possible ET foam solutions
- Prev by Date: Re: PAL ramp photos
- Next by Date: Re: PAL ramp photos
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- Next by thread: Re: Possible ET foam solutions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading