Re: International Space Agency
- From: "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:58:17 GMT
Chuckle.... What harm could it do to put her point in a faq though..
PS never even heard of the organisation myself, so maybe organisation is the
wrong term?
Brian
--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"John Doe" <jdoe@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:430F6D07.CA86F161@xxxxxxxxxx
> Derek Lyons wrote:
>>
>> "Victoria" <victoria-scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dear Victoria - there is little confusion as almost nobody but you
>> writes about your 'agency'.
>
> And we know that the real name of the international space agency will be
> Starfleet. It will eventually become part of a greater organisation
> called the Federation. And this won't happen for at least another 150
> years.
>
> And you'll notice that they killed the Star Trek franchise just when
> they were about to document how the Federation gets formed. The current
> government clearly has no intentions of being part of some international
> agency where it doesn't have 100% control and they probably arranged for
> the Star Trek franchise to be killed to prevent that from happening.
>
> One producer tried to rescue Enterprise, and being Cuban born, he
> probably resisted the "suggestions" to cannabalise the franchise and
> tried his best to counter the damage done by the previous producer who
> was intent on killing it to please the current government.
>
>
> And yes, I see black shuttlecraft hovering above me. There are here even
> before I post this. :-) :-) :-) :-)
> And tin foil hats don't protect against phasers and transporters.
.
- References:
- International Space Agency
- From: Victoria
- Re: International Space Agency
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: International Space Agency
- From: John Doe
- International Space Agency
- Prev by Date: Re: SSTO - what's the point?
- Next by Date: Re: Space Shuttle Processing Status Report, 26-08-2005
- Previous by thread: Re: International Space Agency
- Next by thread: Re: White Knight to Orbit was Re: Designing a new orbiter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|