Re: NASA plans return to Moon by 2020?


"Brian Thorn" <bthorn64@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:57tui1hn7u18ku5oo8eucfdfr1n5493m2i@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:07:34 +0100, "Gareth Slee"
> <ga.slee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4261522.stm
>
> Yikes! That "How Humans Will Go Back To The Moon" graphic really
> botched the Crew Launch Vehicle...

How so?

Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Building Real Spaceships
    ... on the moon and mars from which commercial activities will arise. ... without any additional use of propellant. ... but creates a nightmare of different vehicle ... I have suggested a 45,000 ton spacecraft which requires 63,000 tons at ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: What if we still had Saturn V
    ... ::::: vehicle to perform it. ... Bush wants to go back to the moon. ... ::::Saturn V-equivalent replacement. ... We don't need a lift vehicle to go back to the Moon. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: What if we still had Saturn V
    ... :::: vehicle to perform it. ... Bush wants to go back to the moon. ... :::Saturn V-equivalent replacement. ... We don't need a lift vehicle to go back to the Moon. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Perspective
    ... men circled the moon and returned safely, ... as would the manuals for the Apollo 5. ... not describe the 1B) before declaring the vehicle simple compared to ...
    (rec.autos.sport.f1)
  • Re: What if we still had Saturn V
    ... ::: The settlers for the West went by Conestoga wagon. ... ::: The first visits to the Moon went by Saturn V. ... ::: We don't need a lift vehicle to go back to the Moon. ...
    (sci.space.policy)